Name: John Dixon Date: 03/02/19-02:10:04 PM Z
I should have made this to everyone.
-——— Forwarded message ———
From: John Dixon
<[jadixg_at_HIDDEN-E-MAIL]>
Date: Sat, Mar 2, 2019 at 5:58 AM
Subject: Re: regularization scheme
To: V. Shtabovenko
<[dev.vsht_at_HIDDEN-E-MAIL]>
There is no regularization scheme that preserves susy, and there never
will
be.
If there were it would probably also prevent anomalies even when they
are
present.
But according to the BRS ideas we don’t need one.
The question is whether the cohomology has anything that can spoil the
BRS
identities
for susy.
Cheers
John Dixon
On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 11:51 PM V. Shtabovenko <[dev.vsht_at_HIDDEN-E-MAIL]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> no, unfortunately it doesn’t.
>
> Cheers,
> Vladyslav
>
> Am 02.03.19 um 14:43 schrieb Ahmad:
> > Hi everyone!
> >
> > My question is whether FeynCalc supports regularization by
dimensional
> reduction as is required for renormalisation of supersymmetric
models.
> > (as you know the ordinary dimensional regularization does not
preserve
> SUSY)
> >
> > Regards, Ahmad
> >
>
>