Name: Vladyslav Shtabovenko Date: 07/26/17-04:46:09 PM Z
Should be now fixed in both git branches.
Cheers,
Vladyslav
Am 25.07.2017 um 07:39 schrieb Philipp:
> I have tried to do the recursion for
>
> TFI[D, SPD[q, q], {0, 0, 2, 1, 1}, {{1, 0}, {1, 0}, {1,
0}, {1, 0}, {2, 0}}]
>
> however I am ending up with contributions proportional to some
internal private Number in Tarcer
>
> -(1/(8 (-4+D) (-1+D)))CA^2 (-1+GaugeXi)
(Tarcer`Private`Schiebe[1,-]
Tarcer`Private`Schiebe[2,+]+Tarcer`Private`Schiebe[3,-]
Tarcer`Private`Schiebe[4,+]-Tarcer`Private`Schiebe[2,+]
Tarcer`Private`Schiebe[5,-]-Tarcer`Private`Schiebe[4,+]
Tarcer`Private`Schiebe[5,-]) SD[a,b]
SMP[g_s]^4 SPD[q,q] (D FVD[q,Lor1]
FVD[q,Lor2]-MTD[Lor1,Lor2] SPD[q,q])+(1/(4
(-1+D)))CA^2 (-1+GaugeXi) SD[a,b] SMP[g_s]^4
(FVD[q,Lor1] FVD[q,Lor2]-MTD[Lor1,Lor2]
SPD[q,q]) (Subsuperscript[B, {1,0}{1,0}, (D)])^2+(CA^2
(-1+GaugeXi) SD[a,b] SMP[g_s]^4 (48 FVD[q,Lor1]
FVD[q,Lor2]-648 D FVD[q,Lor1] FVD[q,Lor2]+574
D^2 FVD[q,Lor1] FVD[q,Lor2]-193 D^3 FVD[q,Lor1]
FVD[q,Lor2]+24 D^4 FVD[q,Lor1] FVD[q,Lor2]+384
MTD[Lor1,Lor2] SPD[q,q]-232 D MTD[Lor1,Lor2]
SPD[q,q]+49 D^2 MTD[Lor1,Lor2] SPD[q,q]-6 D^3
MTD[Lor1,Lor2] SPD[q,q]) Subsuperscript[J,
{1,0}{1,0}{1,0}, (D)])/(12 (-6+D) (-4+D) (-1+D) SPD[q,q])
>
> Am I missing something in the computation or is this a potential
bug?
>
> Cheers,
> Philipp
>